For workloads that need the depth of a hyperscaler, managed databases, global CDN, serverless functions, we build on AWS. It's not the default for every project, but when the scale or compliance requirements call for it, it's the right foundation.
The same three-phase process we use for everything we build: consult, build, run. AWS changes what happens inside each phase, not the structure.
The right services for the actual load, not the biggest instance available.
Provisioned and versioned, so environments are reproducible rather than hand-configured.
Monitoring, scaling and incident response handled as part of Brova Cloud, not a separate ticket queue.
A tool is only as good as the discipline around it. Here is what "we use AWS" actually means on an engagement.
RDS and Aurora sized and tuned for the actual workload, not over-provisioned by default.
Lambda for workloads that don't need an always-on server running idle.
CloudFront and S3 for content that needs to load fast anywhere in the world.
VPC and IAM configured deliberately, never a wide-open default.
Here's what people usually want to know about AWS before they get in touch.
No. AWS is what we reach for when a workload genuinely needs the depth of a hyperscaler: managed databases at scale, a global CDN, serverless functions, or specific compliance requirements. For smaller or more predictable workloads, self-hosted infrastructure on Proxmox or a simpler setup is often the better and cheaper answer; the architecture design step in our process decides which fits.
We provision infrastructure as code, so environments are reproducible and versioned rather than hand-configured and undocumented. Least-privilege access is configured deliberately (VPC and IAM set up on purpose, not left on defaults), and monitoring, scaling and incident response run as part of Brova Cloud rather than a separate, disconnected ticket queue nobody owns.
Either works. Projects can run under your own AWS account, which keeps billing and ownership entirely with you, or under our managed environment as part of Brova Cloud. Which one makes sense depends on your compliance requirements and whether you want a dedicated internal team eventually taking over operations.
Anything with unpredictable or large-scale traffic, workloads that need managed databases like RDS or Aurora, global content delivery through CloudFront, or serverless functions for spiky, event-driven work. If none of that applies, we'll say so rather than defaulting to the biggest option available.
Brova Cloud is our managed operations layer; AWS is one of the infrastructure providers we build it on top of for projects that need it. Brova Cloud is the monitoring, patching and incident response discipline; AWS is the underlying compute, storage and networking for workloads at that scale.
Or message us on WhatsApp, +44 7883 256391. We reply within one business day.